Case study of a perimeter security deployment with multiple camera tracking video analytics |
|
Please, note that the article is automtically translated from Russian into English, so the translation may not be accurate. The article describes a case study of a perimeter security deployment with multiple camera tracking (MCT) video analytics. We have applied (1) the methodology for an automated designing and evaluation of the effectiveness of security systems, developed by the company “Amulet”, weatherproof cameras of "ByteErg”, video analytical device «MagicBox» and video server “VideoServer iX” of the company “Aggregator”; outdoor video analytics company Synesis; a video management platform "Intellect" of the company «iTV». A quantity evaluation of the accuracy performance of the surveillance system has been done, as well as an estimation of the image quality and frames from the video archive have been shown. The parameters of the video analytics settings (calibration) have been described. A multiple camera tracking system has been implemented. 1. Infrastructure description A single-storey brick house with a base 11 by 13 m and the attic at two levels, the total height of 13 m located at a distance of 3 m from the old wooden houses on a plot size of 31 to 56 meters. The plot surrounds a wooden fence height of 2.5 meters from the front and 2 meters from the neighbors. Around the house are garden trees and shrubs, only about 30 stands. The house is located in a climatic zone Moscow area zone. Potential threats and challenges of video surveillance system Prior to the deployment of video surveillance systems have been documented cases of illegal entry of people to the site over the fence from the front and neighbors into the home through a window to rob. The objectives of this surveillance system are:
Supplemented by customer requirements:
3. Hardware Table 1 shows the main equipment selected for constructing of a system of the street surveillance. Table 1 List of major equipment
The most important aspects of the Guidelines for selecting and installing cameras for providing video analytics, weatherproof operation are listed below:
4. Camera placement The initial placement of the camera was the proposal by experts and tested using the software package CAD "Amulet". Testing results are shown on the pictures 1-8, where we used the following color designations:
Feature of the method "Amulet" is a statistical modeling by the Monte Carlo method by a pseudo-random distribution of violations in a given volume. The method allows to evaluate the effectiveness of coating chambers in the control area, to identify the dead band and duplication of cells. To test the selected area around the house with the linear dimensions of 2 and 3 meters respectively in height and width. As a result of statistical modeling assessed the probability of intruder detection chamber in a single exposure (the capture of one frame). Estimating the probability was 0.92. The obtained value is calculated taking into account the direction and camera settings, given environmental conditions and characteristics of the offender. If you are using analytics to interframe motion analysis, ie the ability to accompany the objects, the probability of detection increases significantly with a decrease in the probability of false alarm. For example, video analytics company Synesis " with the correct placement of the camera provides srednesezonnuyu probability of finding a person not less than 0.99 . Significant increase in the sensitivity of the detector determines that the information is collected over time based on processing of multiple frames. If the probability of detecting a person in one frame is 0.92, the probability of detection of 25 frames (the appearance of a person for 2 seconds at a frequency of handling 12.5 frames per second) to reach at least 0.99. During the movement, changing the contrast of the observed violator, as well as an opportunity to amplify the signal due to the correlation of several low-contrast areas on the motion path.
Picture 1. Cameras 1 and 2 placement
Picture 2. Cameras 3 and 4 placement
Picture 3. Cameras 5 and 6 placement
Picture 4. Cameras 7 and 8 placement
Picture 5. Modeling placement, cameras 1-2
Picture 6. Modeling placement, cameras 3-4
Picture 7. Modeling placement, cameras 5-6
Picture 8. Vulnerable area 5. Video managment system (VMS)The video management system (VMS) is "Intellect" of iTV. The main arguments for choosing this platform are:
As a turnkey solution with software "intelligence" used VideoServer iX, delivered by aggregator. The server consists of hardware DEPO Race S1 with an Intel Core i7 930 at a frequency of 2.80 GHz and 250 GB hard disks and 2000 GB SATA-II. Installed software includes the operating system Microsoft Windows 7 Professional, video surveillance platform "Intellect" 4.8.0.247 Service Device Pack version 3.1.9.293, Device Manager ONVIF version 0.1.1966. Setting out in accordance with the Administrator's Guide MagicBox device. Platform "Intellect" has provided a video recording of events, intelligent search the archive, and remote access. Device Manager ONVIF used for initial device configuration MagicBox, in particular, to calibrate its built-in video analytics. 6. Outdoor video analyticsRecognition of streaming video with the automatic formation of alarm messages is implemented based on hardware video analytics built into the device MagicBox. High precision detection of people in outdoor surveillance with noise of natural origin, such as uneven lighting changes, the movement of trees, rain and camera shake from the wind, served as the main criterion for choosing this device. The introduction of a specialized video analytics to protect the perimeter has significantly reduced the number of false positives. For example, motion detector, built into the system "intelligence", in spite of the fine-tuning masks and thresholds of sensitivity (Picture 9), gave over 1,000 alarms each month at the facility. Simultaneously, the detector did not respond in 20-30% of cases, the appearance of people in the field of view (Picture 10). Skipping events leads to the fact that the video was not made and an alarm message is sent. Device MagicBox, whose settings are presented in Picture 11-12, reduced the number of false positives to 1-2 in the first month in the facility in the absence of missed alarms. Picture 5 shows an example of detecting and tracking human MagicBox device in the case when the detector does not react, "Intellect." Annual statistics of true and false positives at the moment is going to objectively evaluate the effectiveness of smart video surveillance system during different seasons.
Picture 9. Built-in motion detector settings in the "Intellect" system: the mask detector (left) and the parameters of the detector (right)
Picture 10. Errors of the embedded detector in the "Intellect" system: false alarm from the motion of the branches (left) and missed the alarming situation in 37 seconds (right)
Picture 11.“Synesis” video analytics configuration: calibration of the depth and area support (left), the signal lines (right)
Picture 12."Synesis" video analytics calibration using Application Device Manager ONVIF (ONVIF Device Manager)
Picture 13.The work of “Synesis” video analytics: appearance of a man (left), detection and tracking (right)
6. Оценка качества изображенияPictures 14-22 compare the frames received from the cameras IAC-0842 ARP producted by Byterg during daylight (in daylight) and in the dark (using IR illumination). MagicBox device captured the signal PAL, made H.264 compression and transmission of streaming video in accordance with standard ONVIF.
Picture 14. Camera 1 in daytime (left) and during the night (right)
Picture 15. Camera 2 in daytime (left) and during the night (right)
Picture 16. Camera 3 in daytime (left) and during the night (right)
Picture 17. Camera 4 in daytime (left) and during the night (right)
Picture 18. Camera 5 in daytime (left) and during the night (right)
Picture 19. Camera 6 in daytime (left) and during the night (right))
Picture 20. Camera 7 in daytime (left) and during the night (right)
Picture 21. Camera 8 in daytime (left) and during the night (right)
Picture 22. Camera 9 in daytime (left) and during the night (right) Conclusions on the quality of the image:
7. Multiple camera tracking (MCT)Street surveillance cameras located around the perimeter of the building with a good overlap of zones of visibility that enables you to implement a multiple camerat tracking video analytics. This technology allows to:
![]() Picture 23. Local trajectories of the movements of a man in the field of view of several cameras (6th, 3rd, 4th, 2nd and 1st) before their consolidation with the multicamera video analytics.
Picture 24. The construction of a whole trajectory of the movements of a man on the map using the multicamera video analytics. Pictures 23-24 are an example of how an algorithm for multi-tracking is used for unifying of five trajectories of the same object, obtained from five different cameras. This allowed us to reconstruct the trajectory of an object at a distance much greater than the field of view of one camera. Moreover, this association can initiate only one alarm event at a real object (instead of 5, which would have been generated if the multicamera analytics had not been used). 9. Conclusions We have reviewed the case study of a perimeter security deployment with multiple camera tracking video analytics. Features of this solution are:
|






































